Quoting · 15 January 2026 · 4 min read

Why your quoting process is costing you money

Manual quoting is the quiet tax most shops never put a number against. It hides inside "engineering time" — and it is usually your best engineer's time.

You receive a STEP file or a PDF drawing from a prospect. Your lead engineer opens it in CAM, then spends a good chunk of the next hour or two analysing geometry and complexity, sanity-checking cycle times on your machines, pricing material against your suppliers, working out labour and overhead, and writing the thing up.

The prospect does not like the price, so you spend more time revising it. A few days later, they stop responding. This happens over and over in a busy week, and almost no one tracks what it really costs — because it never shows up as a line item.

The cost is real, even if you have never counted it

You do not need a fabricated industry study to see the shape of this. Do the arithmetic for your own shop with your own numbers. Take an honest average of how long a quote takes you, including revisions. Multiply by how many you send in a week. Multiply that by the loaded hourly cost of whoever does the quoting.

A worked illustration. Suppose a quote takes you 90 minutes all-in, you send a dozen a week, and the person quoting costs you £50 an hour loaded. That is 18 hours and roughly £900 a week tied up in quoting alone — most of a full day of your most valuable person, every week. Plug in your own figures; the point is to actually plug them in.

Whatever number you land on, it is rarely small, and it is almost never free time. It is time your most capable person is not spending on the floor.

The hidden costs nobody quantifies

Slow response time

Because quoting takes time, prospects do not get a number the same day. The longer the gap, the more likely they have already moved on to whoever replied faster. You will struggle to measure exactly how many bids this loses you — but if you have ever lost one purely because a competitor was quicker, you know it is not zero.

Inconsistent pricing

Two engineers quote the same job differently — one applies a 25% margin, the next 30%, a third forgets a setup. Your margins swing depending on who happened to pick up the drawing. Inconsistency is its own slow leak, and unlike a one-off mistake it repeats on every job.

Opportunity cost

While your lead engineer is quoting, they are not managing production. Problems get caught later, quality issues escalate slower, and your best person is doing admin instead of engineering. That cost is real even though it never appears on an invoice.

It gets worse as you grow

As a shop grows, quoting volume climbs but the time per quote does not fall. Eventually you either hire someone to handle quotes, or your lead engineer quietly becomes a full-time quoting machine. Some shops bring in an admin person purely to collect drawings, pass them to engineering, format quotes and send them out — and the engineering time still sits on top of that. Either way, you are paying twice for a process that should be getting cheaper, not dearer.

What good quoting looks like

The shops that quote well are not working harder — they have taken the guesswork out:

  • Parametric pricing rules, so similar parts price consistently (if it weighs under 5kg in this material, labour and stock fall in a known band).
  • A sensible cap on quote time, so a single drawing cannot swallow an afternoon.
  • A second pair of eyes to review and approve before it goes out.
  • A habit of responding inside a day — ideally same day.

Faster, more consistent quoting tends to win more work and frees your lead engineer to go back to engineering. Those are the levers; you do not need a fictional ROI table to believe them.

How AI quoting changes the shape of it

Upload a STEP file. The model reads geometry and complexity, your own pricing rules are applied, and a draft quote comes out in seconds. Your engineer reviews it in a couple of minutes rather than rebuilding it from scratch, nudges the margin on a strategic bid, and sends it.

The judgement still belongs to a human — AI is not going to know that this customer always argues stock, or that you want this contract for strategic reasons. What it removes is the repetitive analysis. For a shop quoting fifteen jobs a week, even twenty minutes saved per quote adds up to most of a working day back, week after week.

The honest version of the pitch. We are not going to promise you a specific pound figure we cannot stand behind. We will say this: if quoting is eating your best engineer's week, cutting the repetitive part of it gives that time back — and faster, more consistent quotes are easier to win on. Run your own numbers and decide whether that is worth it for your shop.

DMOS feeds quotes straight through into jobs, so a won quote does not get re-keyed — it becomes the job, with its routing and materials intact. That removes a second round of admin most shops never count either.

Put a number on it. See what faster, more consistent quoting is worth to your shop — on your own figures.

Try the ROI calculator →

Book a demo

See how DMOS quotes a real part.

Twenty minutes on a video call. We show you DMOS running on our own shop floor — quote to job to invoice — then talk through what your setup would look like.

Book a 20-min demo